Wisconsin judge finds GOP election investigator in contempt | WUWM 89.7 FM

A Wisconsin choose on Friday identified the investigator hired by Republicans to look into former President Donald Trump’s 2020 loss in the battleground condition in contempt for the reason that of how his office environment responded to open up documents requests connected to the probe.

The ruling against the business office led by Michael Gableman, a former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice who briefly labored for Trump, arrived immediately after Gableman berated the judge and refused to answer any thoughts on the witness stand. Gableman experienced not needed to testify, but Dane County Circuit Decide Frank Remington requested him to surface.

Remington did not quickly announce a penalty in court docket on Friday, indicating he would provide that in a prepared choice.

Gableman was hired a calendar year in the past by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, beneath pressure from Trump to look into the former president’s reduction to President Joe Biden by just below 21,000 votes in Wisconsin. The investigation has cost taxpayers about $900,000 so considerably.

Biden’s victory has survived two recounts, several lawsuits, a nonpartisan audit and a evaluate by a conservative regulation business. Only a couple of dozen people out of almost 3.3 million voters have been charged with fraud, quantities on par with past elections.

Gableman has issued two interim stories, but his perform has faced a barrage of bipartisan criticism and Vos put his get the job done on hold this spring pending the outcome of lawsuits challenging his capability to subpoena elected officers and others who labored on elections.

American Oversight, a liberal watchdog team, filed a few open information lawsuits versus Gableman, Vos and the Wisconsin Assembly. The group has received a sequence of victories prior to Remington and another Dane County choose following Gableman and Vos unsuccessful to make the requested information in a well timed way.

Gableman has argued that his staff members member, Zakory Niemierowicz, was the authorized custodian accountable for responding to American Oversight’s requests. Gableman’s attorneys had argued that for the reason that of that, Gableman’s testimony was not needed.

That prompted Remington on Wednesday to caution Niemierowicz that he could want to employ the service of his personal attorney if Gableman’s approach was to blame him for failing to comply with court docket orders.

An lawyer for Gableman’s workplace experimented with to delay Friday’s hearing but Gableman was pressured to acquire the stand. Gableman refused to reply questions from the lawyer symbolizing American Oversight and testily stated Remington had “abandoned his role as a neutral magistrate and is performing as an advocate.”

Remington admonished Gableman and stated he should not have to instruct the former condition Supreme Court docket justice “on the habits I anticipate of you as a witness on this stand.” Gableman then demanded a personal lawyer and mentioned he would not reply even more queries.

“I’m not heading to be railroaded,” he claimed.

Gableman has publicly produced, and delivered to American Oversight, hundreds of pages of paperwork connected to the investigation. His lawyers have insisted that anything asked for has been delivered. Gableman has also explained that he is exempt from retaining data and his office frequently destroys paperwork considered “irrelevant or worthless.”

That is opposite to an assessment by the nonpartisan Legislative Council that found deleting these types of documents, even by a state contractor this sort of as Gableman, violates Wisconsin legislation. Gableman’s lawyer, James Bopp, has argued in court docket filings that the record retention law does not pertain to contractors.

Remington in April, and Dane County Circuit Decide Valerie Bailey-Rihn in Might, both purchased Gableman to cease deleting data that may possibly be responsive to American’s Oversight’s requests.