The Richland College Board at Tuesday night’s conference will consider having to pay the lawful expenses of 3 of its associates concerned in a recall exertion.
An agenda item to “consider requests, conversations, and potential vote(s)” to shell out for board associates Audra Byrd, Semi Hen and Kari Williams’ legal professional fees is on the April 26 agenda.
The five-member board satisfies 6:30 p.m. by way of Zoom and in-person.
Galt Pettett, lawful counsel for the board and faculty district, claimed he’s not sure if the 3 board customers will want to recuse themselves from the vote, citing current board policy on conflicts of desire.
A willpower will be designed before the vote, he claimed.
The trio are facing a remember effort levied by a group of Richland voters soon after the three board users voted in February to go against Gov. Jay Inslee’s mask mandate and make them optional in their faculty district.
The remember petitions alleges Byrd, Williams and Hen exceeded their electric power as faculty board members, broke condition law by violating the governor’s crisis proclamation and indoor COVID mask mandate, broke Washington’s open up conferences legislation, and violated various faculty district ethics and procedures in the system.
These petitions have been filed April 11.
A ballot synopsis of prices will be read by a Benton County Remarkable Courtroom decide, who will have till Could 11 to make a perseverance if the fees satisfy the state’s conditions for remember.
The move to briefly go “mask optional” set board members — and the university district — in risky legal territory.
A lawsuit was submitted shortly after the vote by an open governing administration activist, who’s saying the 3 board customers and district violated state Open up Community Conferences Act legal guidelines.
The board has not had any community dialogue yet on that lawsuit, which is nevertheless in the early phases.
This story was originally printed April 26, 2022 12:18 PM.